skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Bangaru, Aaditya_Venkatesha Babu"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. ABSTRACT Dielectrophoresis (DEP) has been extensively researched over the years for filtration, separation, detection, and collection of micro/nano/bioparticles. Numerical models have historically been employed to predict particle trajectories in three‐dimensional (3D) DEP systems, but a common issue arises due to inherent noise near the edges of electrodes due to electric potential discontinuity, specifically when calculating electric field and gradient of electric field‐squared, . This noise can be reduced to a certain extent with a finer mesh density but results near the electrode edge still have significant error. Realizing the importance of particle‐electrode edge interactions prevalent in positive DEP systems, analytical solutions given by Sun et al. was incorporated to demonstrate an improved 3D model of interdigitated electrodes. The results of electric field and gradient of electric field‐squared of the numerical model and the improved analytical 3D model were compared, within a simulation space of 50 µm height, 10 µm width, and 50 µm length with interdigitated electrodes of the same width and gap of 10 µm. The DEP particle trajectory error due to the noise was quantified for different particle sizes at various heights above the electrode edge. For example, at 5 Vrms, a trapped 500 nm particles exhibited a velocity error of 104µm/s (it should have been zero). 
    more » « less
    Free, publicly-accessible full text available February 18, 2026